Nearly a year ago, The Supreme Court held in Law v. Siegel (In re Law), No. 12-5196, 571 U.S. ___ (March 4, 2014), that despite a debtor’s misdeeds, the Bankruptcy Court still has to follow the Bankruptcy Code and can’t just dispense its own sense of justice ad hoc. This same reasoning was recently applied […]
Contact Us:
Free Consultation
408.286.2766
Connect:
Topics:
- Automatic Stay
- Bankruptcy and Employment
- Bankruptcy and Taxes
- Bankruptcy Basics
- Bankruptcy Discharge
- Bankruptcy Exemptions
- Bankruptcy in General
- Bankruptcy Litigation
- Bankruptcy Reform
- Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
- Chapter 13 Lien Stripping
- Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
- Chapter 7 Trustee
- Consumer Protection
- Credit and Bankruptcy
- Credit Card Debt
- Credit Counseling and Debtor Education
- Creditor Harassment
- Debt Settlement
- Foreclosure
- Fraudulent Transfers
- History of Bankruptcy Law
- Joint Tenancy Title
- Judicial Liens
- Loan Modification
- Meeting of Creditors
- Personal Liability for Business Debts
- Reaffirmation Agreements
- Student Loans in Bankruptcy
-
Recent Entries:
- US Supreme Court Decision in In re Law Limits Courts’ Discretion to Paint Debtors with the “Bad Faith” Brush
- 2014 Enhancements of California’s Anti-Deficiency Statutes Give Added Protections to Foreclosed Homeowners
- In re Flores: Bad for Chapter 13 debtors, Bad for Chapter 13 Creditors Too
- Federal Consumer Protection Agency Cracks Down on Debt Settlement Scam
- Can I Keep My Luxury Car, RV, and Boat, in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in California?
Legal Blogs